![]() |
The
Council of Committee on the
|
![]() |
|
The
Committee on the Southern Border, a joint undertaking between The
Council of State Governments-WEST (CSG-WEST)
and the Southern Legislative Conference (SLC), met on November 17,
2000 in San Diego, California, during the CSG-West Annual Meeting.
The meeting, which was attended by legislators from California,
Idaho, Colorado, Nevada, Texas, and Arizona, as well as the Mexican
states of Baja California, Chihuahua and Sonora, focused on three
themes: the XVIII meeting of the Border Governors’ Conference, the
impact of the recent Mexican elections on border relations, and
environmental successes and barriers along the border. After
calling the session to order, California Assemblywoman Denise Moreno
Ducheny asked those present to introduce themselves and mentioned that
CSG-West had updated its Mexican Border Northern States Directory of
Elected Officials. After
giving a brief history of the Committee, Ducheny invited Kristen
Miller Aliotti of the California Governor’s Office to make her
presentation on the XVIII Border Governors’ Conference (BGC), which
took place in Sacramento, California in June 2000.
She outlined the accomplishments of the Conference, also
presenting slides submitted by the Tamaulipas delegation, which was
unable to attend the San Diego meeting.
Ms. Aliotti explained that nine
governors, one from each of the 10 border states save one,
attended this meeting, which gave the governors a chance to work
together closely. Also
present were leaders of industry and many members of the media, as
well as two governor’s representatives from each border state. Work groups included tourism, education, environment and
agriculture, and the governors also discussed multiple topics in
private. The work of the Conference, which is based on consensus,
culminated in the signing of the BGC Joint Declaration.
A
suggestion was made that each legislator present at the session of the
Committee on the Southern Border write their respective governors
requesting that at the conclusion of the BGC, each governor, as soon as
possible, send every state legislator a copy of the BGC Joint
Declaration and an overview of what was accomplished at the Conference.
Next year’s meeting will take place on June 7-8, 2001 in
Tampico, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Asserting
that the Mexican polity will stay in place, de la Garza warned not to
expect a sea change as a result of the election of PAN-candidate
Vicente Fox since his policies are not typical of the party.
De la Garza paints Fox as an unpredictable independent who has
reached out to try to unite Mexicans against the long-ruling PRI.
Neither is he a typical PAN member, although he ran on the PAN
ticket. There could be
major changes, however, if the two main parties, the PRI and the PAN,
work together in the federal legislature. According
to de la Garza, President Fox takes office unbeholden to the previous
regime. Under Fox there
is a good possibility of an increase in federalism in Mexico for two
reasons: the principle of
more state power after years of PRI-inspired centralization; and the
possibility of saddling states with problems which would no longer be
the concern of the federal government.
There could also be a change in attitude toward the United
States, with Fox loathe to accept Mexico’s subordination to its
northern neighbor. The
new president has been direct in his demands for equal treatment.
Unlike the previous government, Fox has tried to put the
immigration issue on the table, creating a new department which
focuses on Mexican nationals living in the United States.
Possibly complicating Mexico’s future relations with the
U.S., Fox’s foreign policy advisers include intellectuals who are
highly critical of Mexico’s northern neighbor. Immigration
has come to the forefront of U.S. / Mexico policy issues.
According to de la Garza, immigration is both a domestic and
international issue, one that cannot be affected by domestic policy
alone. Half of all Mexican nationals in the United States are
concentrated in just eight counties, including three in southern
California, two in Texas, and Cook County in Illinois, and
three-quarters of Mexican nationals live in three states.
Furthermore, most Mexican immigrants come from a handful of
Mexican states. De la
Garza sees no prospect for a decrease in immigration in the next 20
years. He also brought up the issue of national security versus free
trade. The
topic of Mexicans in the United States also plays a great role in the
relations between the two countries.
When Fox mentioned that he wanted to be president of 118 million
Mexicans, a statement which made some nervous on both sides of the
border, he was fully aware that only 100 million live in Mexico.
De la Garza also explored the issue of dual nationality, which
allows many Mexican-Americans to claim Mexican nationality without
voting rights. There is
also debate about extending
dual citizenship, with 15 percent of the Mexican electorate residing in
the United States. The
issue of Mexican nationals versus Mexican-Americans also was addressed.
De la Garza noted that while Mexican-Americans support rights for
immigrants, they by and large do not support immigration itself.
Ironically, immigrants often have more representation in their
adopted community in the U.S., which, according to de la Garza, is
becoming increasingly more “Mexicanized,” than in Mexico itself. Professor
de la Garza ended his presentation by mentioning states’ ability to
set foreign policy, saying that it is possible in a practical sense as
long as it does not contradict existing federal policy.
Questions from the audience touched upon families split up
immigration policy, the fate of the U.S. labor market if Mexican workers
were to return home, and non-tariff barriers to trade. Next,
Ms. Diana Borja, Director of the Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission’s (TNRCC) Border Affairs department, spoke on successes
and barriers of environmental programs on the border.
The TNRCC is the lead environmental agency in Texas, issuing
permits, managing water rights and assisting in regulatory compliance.
Beginning in 1996, heads of Mexican and U.S. environmental
agencies have been meeting and identifying common priorities.
The most recent meeting took place in March 2000 in Arizona.
TNRCC has also emphasized the establishment of a
cross-notification program between U.S. and Mexican states on matters
concerning the environment. The agency is also preparing briefing documents on the
environment for both federal governments with the Rio Grande River as
the center of the region in a social, cultural and economic sense. TNRCC
has begun a recognition program of maquiladoras
with the Mexican state of Tamaulipas and is working on the same with
the states of Coahuila and Nuevo Léon.
Ms. Borja added that technological exchange programs and
strategic environmental plans with Nuevo Leon, Coahuila, Chihuahua and
Tamaulipas had begun as well. In
addition, domestic programs such as STEP (Small Town Environment
Program) and Border Solid Waste, which enables communities to
coordinate waste removal, have been quite successful.
TNRCC also has been successful in reducing waste and saving
water and energy on the border. Furthermore, according to Ms. Borja, the Texas Legislature
has supported the agency’s initiative to enable companies operating
on one side of the border to compensate communities on the other side
if the concerns violate their permits. Concerning
barriers, Ms. Borja pointed out that challenges remain in areas such
as defining jurisdictions, since issues which are handled by states in
the United States may be under the purview of the federal government
in Mexico, for example. She
stressed that there is a need for more interaction between U.S. and
Mexican legislators so that problems can be solved more easily, since
border communities are often confronted with challenges which can be
better dealt with by coordinating with the city directly across the
border than with the state capital.
Questions
following Ms. Borja’s presentation included inquiries about the
possibility of funding road construction on the border of Arizona and
Sonora and providing environmental services to colonias,
a name often given to substandard housing found along the border.
Finally,
two legislators from Mexico spoke about challenges facing U.S. / Mexico
relations. Diputado Ernesto
Munro Palacio of Sonora focused on Mexico’s acceptance of
globalization since the passage of NAFTA, and Diputado Jesus Manuel
Tarin Barca of Chihuahua talked about economic help for migrant workers,
who, whether legal or not, make great contributions to the U.S. economy.
At
the conclusion of the session, Committee Vice Chair Representative Henry
Cuellar, Texas, presented outgoing Chair Assemblywoman Denise Moreno
Ducheny, California, with a plaque acknowledging her chairmanship of the
Committee. |
|
ARIZONA Senator Herb Guenther Marcus E. Rodriguez, University of Arizona Senator Vic Soltero
CALIFORNIA Kristen Miller Aliotti, Governor’s Office of California-Mexico Affairs Stacy Birch, Office of Senator Deirdre Alpert Jeff Brown, Senate Office of Research
Assemblywoman Denise Moreno Ducheny Cheryl Duvauchelle, CSG-West Dave Lawson, Zeneca/Syngenta Dolores
Osorio, Office of Assemblywoman Ducheny Clarissa
Reyes, San Diego Economic Development Luis Quinonex,
University of San Francisco Eunice
Valle, Governor’s Office of California - Mexico Affairs Kip Wiley, Senate
Office of Research Eileen
Woodbury, University of San Francisco Assemblywoman Charlene
Zettel CHIHUAHUA Diputado Luis Pavel
Aguilar Raynal Diputado Carlos
Dominguez Diputado Jesus Manuel
Tarin Baca Diputado Rafael Torres
|
COLORADO Kent Briggs, CSG-West Senator Rob Hernandez Myrle Myers, Johnson
& Johnson Representative Abel
Tapia Representative Val
Vigil GEORGIA Douglas
Jacobson, Southern Legislative Conference KENTUCKY Dan
Sprague, The Council of State Governments IDAHO Senator Cecil Ingram Representative Wayne
Kendall NEVADA Assemblywoman Barbara
Cegavske Assemblywoman Vonne
Chowning Assemblyman Don
Gustavson Felix Ortiz,
Legislative Analyst NEW
MEXICO Senator Tim Jennings NORTHERN
MARIANA ISLANDS Representative Dino M.
Jones |