The Council of State Governments

 

Committee on the Southern Border

 

 

The Committee on the Southern Border, a joint undertaking between The Council of State Governments-WEST (CSG-WEST) and the Southern Legislative Conference (SLC), met on November 17, 2000 in San Diego, California, during the CSG-West Annual Meeting.  The meeting, which was attended by legislators from California, Idaho, Colorado, Nevada, Texas, and Arizona, as well as the Mexican states of Baja California, Chihuahua and Sonora, focused on three themes: the XVIII meeting of the Border Governors’ Conference, the impact of the recent Mexican elections on border relations, and environmental successes and barriers along the border.

After calling the session to order, California Assemblywoman Denise Moreno Ducheny asked those present to introduce themselves and mentioned that CSG-West had updated its Mexican Border Northern States Directory of Elected Officials.  After giving a brief history of the Committee, Ducheny invited Kristen Miller Aliotti of the California Governor’s Office to make her presentation on the XVIII Border Governors’ Conference (BGC), which took place in Sacramento, California in June 2000.  She outlined the accomplishments of the Conference, also presenting slides submitted by the Tamaulipas delegation, which was unable to attend the San Diego meeting.  Ms. Aliotti explained that nine  governors, one from each of the 10 border states save one, attended this meeting, which gave the governors a chance to work together closely.  Also present were leaders of industry and many members of the media, as well as two governor’s representatives from each border state.  Work groups included tourism, education, environment and agriculture, and the governors also discussed multiple topics in private. The work of the Conference, which is based on consensus, culminated in the signing of the BGC Joint Declaration. 

A suggestion was made that each legislator present at the session of the Committee on the Southern Border write their respective governors requesting that at the conclusion of the BGC, each governor, as soon as possible, send every state legislator a copy of the BGC Joint Declaration and an overview of what was accomplished at the Conference.  Next year’s meeting will take place on June 7-8, 2001 in Tampico, Tamaulipas, Mexico.

Following Ms. Aliotti, Professor Rodolfo de la Garza of the University of Texas presented his views on the impact of the recent Mexican elections on border relations.  De la Garza began by noting that Mexico’s importance to the United States is increasing, whereas this previously had not been the case.  As examples, he mentioned that San Diego historically looked to the north and east, but rarely to the south for economic opportunities, and that knowledge of Spanish is now seen as desirable in today’s job market.  He also noted that the border extends further north in a cultural sense, with many Mexican nationals residing in states far from the border. 

Asserting that the Mexican polity will stay in place, de la Garza warned not to expect a sea change as a result of the election of PAN-candidate Vicente Fox since his policies are not typical of the party.  De la Garza paints Fox as an unpredictable independent who has reached out to try to unite Mexicans against the long-ruling PRI.  Neither is he a typical PAN member, although he ran on the PAN ticket.  There could be major changes, however, if the two main parties, the PRI and the PAN, work together in the federal legislature.

According to de la Garza, President Fox takes office unbeholden to the previous regime.  Under Fox there is a good possibility of an increase in federalism in Mexico for two reasons:  the principle of more state power after years of PRI-inspired centralization; and the possibility of saddling states with problems which would no longer be the concern of the federal government.  There could also be a change in attitude toward the United States, with Fox loathe to accept Mexico’s subordination to its northern neighbor.  The new president has been direct in his demands for equal treatment.  Unlike the previous government, Fox has tried to put the immigration issue on the table, creating a new department which focuses on Mexican nationals living in the United States.  Possibly complicating Mexico’s future relations with the U.S., Fox’s foreign policy advisers include intellectuals who are highly critical of Mexico’s northern neighbor.  

Immigration has come to the forefront of U.S. / Mexico policy issues.  According to de la Garza, immigration is both a domestic and international issue, one that cannot be affected by domestic policy alone.  Half of all Mexican nationals in the United States are concentrated in just eight counties, including three in southern California, two in Texas, and Cook County in Illinois, and three-quarters of Mexican nationals live in three states.  Furthermore, most Mexican immigrants come from a handful of Mexican states.  De la Garza sees no prospect for a decrease in immigration in the next 20 years.  He also brought up the issue of national security versus free trade. 

The topic of Mexicans in the United States also plays a great role in the relations between the two countries.  When Fox mentioned that he wanted to be president of 118 million Mexicans, a statement which made some nervous on both sides of the border, he was fully aware that only 100 million live in Mexico.  De la Garza also explored the issue of dual nationality, which allows many Mexican-Americans to claim Mexican nationality without voting rights.  There is also

debate about extending dual citizenship, with 15 percent of the Mexican electorate residing in the United States.  The issue of Mexican nationals versus Mexican-Americans also was addressed.  De la Garza noted that while Mexican-Americans support rights for immigrants, they by and large do not support immigration itself.  Ironically, immigrants often have more representation in their adopted community in the U.S., which, according to de la Garza, is becoming increasingly more “Mexicanized,” than in Mexico itself.

Professor de la Garza ended his presentation by mentioning states’ ability to set foreign policy, saying that it is possible in a practical sense as long as it does not contradict existing federal policy.  Questions from the audience touched upon families split up immigration policy, the fate of the U.S. labor market if Mexican workers were to return home, and non-tariff barriers to trade.

Next, Ms. Diana Borja, Director of the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission’s (TNRCC) Border Affairs department, spoke on successes and barriers of environmental programs on the border.  The TNRCC is the lead environmental agency in Texas, issuing permits, managing water rights and assisting in regulatory compliance.  Beginning in 1996, heads of Mexican and U.S. environmental agencies have been meeting and identifying common priorities.  The most recent meeting took place in March 2000 in Arizona.  TNRCC has also emphasized the establishment of a cross-notification program between U.S. and Mexican states on matters concerning the environment.  The agency is also preparing briefing documents on the environment for both federal governments with the Rio Grande River as the center of the region in a social, cultural and economic sense.

TNRCC has begun a recognition program of maquiladoras with the Mexican state of Tamaulipas and is working on the same with the states of Coahuila and Nuevo Léon.  Ms. Borja added that technological exchange programs and strategic environmental plans with Nuevo Leon, Coahuila, Chihuahua and Tamaulipas had begun as well.  In addition, domestic programs such as STEP (Small Town Environment Program) and Border Solid Waste, which enables communities to coordinate waste removal, have been quite successful.  TNRCC also has been successful in reducing waste and saving water and energy on the border.  Furthermore, according to Ms. Borja, the Texas Legislature has supported the agency’s initiative to enable companies operating on one side of the border to compensate communities on the other side if the concerns violate their permits.

Concerning barriers, Ms. Borja pointed out that challenges remain in areas such as defining jurisdictions, since issues which are handled by states in the United States may be under the purview of the federal government in Mexico, for example.  She stressed that there is a need for more interaction between U.S. and Mexican legislators so that problems can be solved more easily, since border communities are often confronted with challenges which can be better dealt with by coordinating with the city directly across the border than with the state capital. 

Questions following Ms. Borja’s presentation included inquiries about the possibility of funding road construction on the border of Arizona and Sonora and providing environmental services to colonias, a name often given to substandard housing found along the border. 

Finally, two legislators from Mexico spoke about challenges facing U.S. / Mexico relations.  Diputado Ernesto Munro Palacio of Sonora focused on Mexico’s acceptance of globalization since the passage of NAFTA, and Diputado Jesus Manuel Tarin Barca of Chihuahua talked about economic help for migrant workers, who, whether legal or not, make great contributions to the U.S. economy. 

At the conclusion of the session, Committee Vice Chair Representative Henry Cuellar, Texas, presented outgoing Chair Assemblywoman Denise Moreno Ducheny, California, with a plaque acknowledging her chairmanship of the Committee.

 

ARIZONA

Senator Herb Guenther

Marcus E. Rodriguez, University of Arizona

Senator Vic Soltero

 

CALIFORNIA

Kristen Miller Aliotti, Governor’s Office of California-Mexico Affairs

Stacy Birch, Office of Senator Deirdre Alpert

Jeff Brown, Senate Office of Research

Assemblywoman Denise Moreno Ducheny

Cheryl Duvauchelle, CSG-West

Dave Lawson, Zeneca/Syngenta

Dolores Osorio, Office of Assemblywoman Ducheny

Clarissa Reyes, San Diego Economic Development

Luis Quinonex, University of San Francisco

Eunice Valle, Governor’s Office of California - Mexico Affairs

Kip Wiley, Senate Office of Research

Eileen Woodbury, University of San Francisco

Assemblywoman Charlene Zettel

 

CHIHUAHUA

Diputado Luis Pavel Aguilar Raynal

Diputado Carlos Dominguez

Diputado Jesus Manuel Tarin Baca

Diputado Rafael Torres

 

COLORADO

Kent Briggs, CSG-West

Senator Rob Hernandez

Myrle Myers, Johnson & Johnson

Representative Abel Tapia

Representative Val Vigil

 

GEORGIA

Douglas Jacobson, Southern Legislative Conference

 

KENTUCKY

Dan Sprague, The Council of State Governments

 

IDAHO

Senator Cecil Ingram

Representative Wayne Kendall

 

NEVADA

Assemblywoman Barbara Cegavske

Assemblywoman Vonne Chowning

Assemblyman Don Gustavson

Felix Ortiz, Legislative Analyst

 

NEW MEXICO

Senator Tim Jennings

 

NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS

Representative Dino M. Jones